[insert here]
Sellers - Selling your home
Helping you find win-win solutions for your real estate needs

Sellers - Selling your home
Drawbacks of more popular seller financing concepts

Offering seller financing provides you with many benefits. However, you should understand some of the pitfalls associated with the more common forms of seller financing. The draw-backs and risks assocaited with each are briefly discussed here.


Straight Lease
A rental for a specific period of time. Generally incurs a negative cash-flow along with unrecoverable costs of management, maintenance and vacancies. No chance for elevated income.

Lease Option (L/O)
A unilateral agreement to sell with bargain terms at a future date.

So what's wrong with a Lease Option? They've been done for years. The L/O violates a lender's due-on-sale admonitions. A Lease Option can (if an option fee is taken or rent credits given) lead to an inability to evict a defaulting tenant. Such a tenant in default can claim having "Equity" in the property, and in so doing, force a judicial foreclosure process versus an eviction. This can afford him/her months of free rent while the litigation rages on. As well, terms can be changed on a whim relative to buy-out provisions, repairs, equity credits (rent credits), etc.: all requiring extensive, expensive, legal action to rectify.

Contract for Deed (CFD)
The Contract for Deed is essentially a "Lay Away Plan." The property's legal title is relinquished to the vendee (buyer) only after all debt has been paid off: i.e., there is no legal ownership of the property until it's completely paid for.

And the problems are...? The CFD is a direct violation of a lender's due-on-sale clause; there is no means for eviction; the vendee (resident/buyer) holds a "equitable" interest in the property, allowing only for foreclosure, ejectment and quite title in the event of a breach of contract in lieu of eviction. Further, any parties' creditor liens, lawsuits, judgments, marital dispute litigation and tax liens attach to the property...and the death of any party throws the property into probate.

The "Wrap" - All Inclusive Mortgage or All Inclusive Trust Deed (AITD)
In a "Wrap-Around Loan" a seller creates a mortgage loan that is equal to or greater than the current loans on the property. Then from the buyer's single monthly payment to the seller the underlying junior loan payments are made (usually leaving a positive cash flow for the seller). .

So, what's wrong with that? Well, a Wrap violates the lenders' due-on-sale clause; there is no means for eviction in the event of default; the resident/buyer holds an "equitable" interest, necessitating foreclosure, ejectment and quite title actions in lieu of eviction; any parties' creditor liens, lawsuits, judgments and tax liens attach to the property; and the death of any party throws the entire property into probate.

The Equity Share (ES)
A shared-ownership of real estate, wherein two or more parties hold title as tenants-in-common. Typically, one of the parties makes the down payment while the other lives in the property and makes the monthly payments.

So? And the problem is...? An Equity Share clearly violates the mortgage lender's due-on-sale clause; there is no means for eviction of an errant tenant/ buyer in the face of default; the resident/buyer clearly holds "Equity," thereby forcing judicial foreclosure, ejectment and quiet title action in the event of a breach of contract (versus eviction). Any party's liens, lawsuits, judgments, marital dissolution litigation and tax liens attach to the property... .and the death of any party puts property into probate... quite possibly negatively affecting the surviving party.

The "Subject-To"
This is an assumption of mortgage payments subject to a loan's existing terms.

And the problem...? "Subject-To" is basically a generic term that can be applied to any of the above: and like the above, a Subject-To violates the lender's due-on-sale clause; obstructs (stops) one's right of eviction of an errant tenant/buyer; it conveys Equity; it jeopardizes title; it invites disastrous disagreement and litigation between parties. And...any party's business, personal and legal actions attach to the property: thereby seriously negatively affecting the interests of the other party/ies.

There is a better way!
You can still safely and legally offer seller financing while avoiding most if not all of the risks previously discussed. You can start by telling us about your property. Let's see if it makes sense for us to team up and work toward finding your best solution.

 


© 2004 ForMoreInfo.com

Sellers - Selling your home